Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among hotel housekeepers and cleaners: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are among the most frequent and costly occupational health problems with a rising prevalence globally. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to know and evaluate the prevalence of MSD by anatomic location among hotel housekeepers (HHs) and cleaners. METHODS: Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Dialnet Plus, PEDro and Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews using a search strategy to identify cross-sectional studies reporting on the prevalence of MSD in HHs or cleaners. The risk of bias was assessed with Joanna Briggs Institute tool for systematic reviews. A random-effects model was used in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included in the systematic review, nine of them in the meta-analysis (n = 2299). The study sample sizes ranged from 24 to 1043 participants. The Standardized Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire was the most common tool used to assess MSD among both HHs and cleaners (9/19 of the included studies). The three most affected anatomic locations were the low back 53.9% (95% CI: 43.3-64.6), shoulders 41.4% (95% CI: 27.1-55.8), and wrists/hands 40.1% (95% CI: 24.5-55.7). CONCLUSIONS: HHs and cleaners have a high prevalence of MSD. Low back pain is the most prevalent MSD among both HHs and cleaners affecting up to one of two people.

DiabeText, a mobile health intervention to support medication taking and healthy lifestyle in adults with type 2 diabetes: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of DiabeText, a low-intensity, multifaceted, mobile health (mHealth) intervention to support medication taking and lifestyle change targeted to people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). DESIGN: Phase III, 12-months, two-arm (1:1 allocation ratio), randomized parallel-group trial. METHODS: We will recruit 740 adults with glycated hemoglobin (A1c) >8% (>64 mmol/mol) and with at least one prescription of a non-insulin antidiabetic drug. They will be allocated to a control (usual care) group or an intervention (DiabeText messaging intervention) group. The primary outcome measure will be A1c at 12 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include medication possession ratio and behavioral and psychological outcomes. DISCUSSION: Recent trials suggest that digital health interventions can effectively support diabetes self-management improving T2D control and reducing important T2D complications. In Spain this type of interventions is understudied. IMPACT: This trial will strengthen the evidence base of the impact of mHealth interventions to support diabetes self-management. If effective, DiabeText may offer a low-cost and highly scalable strategy to improve health at the population level in a sustainable way. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05006872; Official Title: Supporting People with Type 2 Diabetes in Effective Use of their Medicine Through a System Comprising Mobile Health Technology Integrated with Clinical Care.

La Red de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud (redIAPP): una red de referencia e impulsora de la investigación en atención primaria / The Research Network on Preventive Activities and Health Promotion (redIAPP): a reference network and promoter of primary care research

La Red de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud (redIAPP), una red de referencia e impulsora de la investigación en atención primaria fue creada en 2003 gracias al programa Redes Temáticas de Investigación Cooperativa en Salud (RETICS) del Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII). Su creación ha supuesto un cambio radical en la situación de la investigación en atención primaria. A lo largo de sus 19 años (2003-2021) han participado distintos grupos de investigación y comunidades autónomas, y se han desarrollado distintas líneas de investigación con numerosos proyectos y publicaciones. A pesar de las dificultades sufridas, ha creado una experiencia de investigación colaborativa entre distintas comunidades autónomas con gran vitalidad y con importantes resultados para la atención primaria. La redIAPP, por tanto, ha sido un gran referente para la investigación en atención primaria y para la profundización de su área de conocimiento. Se sugieren varias líneas de mejora para el futuro de la investigación en atención primaria.(AU)

The Research Network on Preventive Activities and Health Promotion (redIAPP), a reference network and promoter of primary care research was created in 2003 thanks to the program Thematic Networks for Cooperative Research in Health (RETICS) of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII). Its creation has meant a radical change in the situation of research in primary care. Throughout its 19 years (2003-2021), different research groups and autonomous communities have participated, and different lines of research have been developed with numerous projects and publications. Despite the difficulties suffered, it has created a collaborative research experience between different autonomous communities with great vitality and with important results for primary care. The redIAPP, therefore, has been a great reference for research in primary care and for the deepening of its area of knowledge. Several lines of improvement are suggested for the future of primary care research.(AU)

[The Research Network on Preventive Activities and Health Promotion (redIAPP): a reference network and promoter of primary care research]. / La Red de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud (redIAPP): una red de referencia e impulsora de la investigación en atención primaria.

The Research Network on Preventive Activities and Health Promotion (redIAPP), a reference network and promoter of primary care research was created in 2003 thanks to the program Thematic Networks for Cooperative Research in Health (RETICS) of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII). Its creation has meant a radical change in the situation of research in primary care. Throughout its 19 years (2003-2021), different research groups and autonomous communities have participated, and different lines of research have been developed with numerous projects and publications. Despite the difficulties suffered, it has created a collaborative research experience between different autonomous communities with great vitality and with important results for primary care. The redIAPP, therefore, has been a great reference for research in primary care and for the deepening of its area of knowledge. Several lines of improvement are suggested for the future of primary care research.

Development and Evaluation of a Digital Health Intervention to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care: The PREDIABETEXT Study Protocol for a Randomised Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a highly prevalent disease associated with an increased risk of comorbidities, premature death, and health costs. Prediabetes is a stage of glucose alteration previous to T2DM, that can be reversed. The aim of the study is to develop and evaluate a low-intensity, multifaceted, digital intervention to prevent T2DM. The intervention comprises: (1) the use of mobile health technology to send tailored text messages promoting lifestyle changes to people at risk of T2DM and (2) the provision of online education to primary healthcare physicians and nurses about management of prediabetes. METHODS: In stages 1-4 we will design, develop and pilot-test the intervention. In Stage 5 we will conduct a phase II, six-month, three-arm, cluster randomized, clinical trial with 42 primary care professionals and 420 patients at risk of T2DM. Patients will be allocated to a control group (usual care), intervention A (patient messaging intervention), or intervention B (patient messaging intervention plus online education to their primary healthcare professionals). The primary outcome will be glycated haemoglobin. All the procedures obtained ethical approval in June 2021 (CEI-IB Ref No: IB4495/21PI). DISCUSSION: Digital health interventions can effectively prevent T2DM and reduce important T2DM risk factors such as overweight or hypertension. In Spain, this type of intervention is understudied. Moreover, there is controversy regarding the type of digital health interventions that are more effective. Findings from this study may contribute to address T2DM prevention, through a low-cost and easily implementable intervention.

Chronic Pain and Work Conditions of Hotel Housekeepers: A Descriptive Study.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain of hotel housekeepers (HHs) and to describe the work conditions and perception of health in this occupational group in the Balearic Islands, Spain. METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive study with HHs of the Balearic Islands, performed in primary care. Random sample of HHs who worked during the 2018 season. We collected information on sociodemographic variables, job characteristics, workload, pain, perceived health, and physical activity. After participants signed the informed consent form, we conducted a face-to-face interview in the primary care centre and accessed the participants' electronic health records. RESULTS: 1043 HHs aged 43.3 ± 10 years and with 10.7 ± 9.1 years worked as HHs were included. 51% (95% CI: 48-54%) reported chronic pain, mainly in the lower back 28.7% (95% CI: 25.9-31.5%), hands/wrists 23.7% (95% CI: 21.1-26.4%), neck 21.6% (95% CI: 19.1-24.3%), shoulders 19.9% (95% CI: 17.4-22.4%), and back 17.8% (95% CI: 15.4-20.2%). Pain was associated with older age, more years worked, more beds made/day and difficulty in pushing the housekeeping cart. More than half HHs reported that they did not incorporate occupational risk prevention measures (ORPMs) into their routine; 17.3% (95% CI: 15.1-19.7%) HHs considered their health as poor or very poor. Perception of health was worse in HHs with chronic pain. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of HHs of the Balearic Islands reported chronic pain, a low compliance with ORPMs and compared to women of the same sociodemographic profile they perceive a worse health status.

Intervención del farmacéutico en la prescripción potencialmente inapropiada en pacientes polimedicados: Protocolo ensayo clínico PHARM-PC / Pharmacist-led intervention on potentially inappropriate prescription in patients with polypharmacy: PHARM-PC clinical trial protocol

Objetivo: La polimedicación y la medicación potencialmente inapropiada (que presenta balance beneficio-riesgo desfavorable) son importantes preocupaciones respecto a los pacientes mayores en atención primaria,ya que pueden incrementar el riesgo de morbimortalidad y los costes sanitarios. Diversos estudios han evaluado el impacto de la revisión sistemáticade la medicación conducida por el farmacéutico sobre variables de adecuación, recursos sanitarios y/o costes. Sin embargo, no se han encontradoensayos controlados aleatorizados por clúster que evalúen globalmentetodas estas variables. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar el impactode una revisión sistemática de medicación conducida por el farmacéuticopara reducir el número medio y la proporción de pacientes con medicaciónpotencialmente inapropiada (objetivo principal), así como para reducir lamorbimortalidad y los costes (objetivos secundarios).Método: Se realizará un ensayo clínico abierto, controlado y aleatorizado por clústeres, donde los médicos de atención primaria, en representación de sus respectivos cupos de pacientes, serán aleatorizadosa recibir recomendaciones del farmacéutico para retirar medicacionespotencialmente inapropiadas detectadas mediante combinación de métodos implícitos y explícitos (grupo intervención) o no recibirlas (grupo control). Las variables primarias serán la proporción de pacientes y el númeromedio de medicaciones potencialmente inapropiadas por paciente. Lasvariables secundarias serán los recursos asistenciales frecuentados, proporción de pacientes fallecidos y días de supervivencia; y costes de medicamentos y de recursos asistenciales. (AU)

Objective: Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications(that is, those associated with an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio) are common concerns in the context of elderly patients treated in primary care asthey may increase the risk of morbidity and mortality, as well as healthcare costs. Several studies have assessed the impact of pharmacist-ledsystematic reviews with respect to prescription appropriateness, healthoutcomes and/or costs. However, no cluster-randomized controlled trialhas been identified that provides an overall assessment of these variables.The objective is to determine the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led systematic medication review in reducing the mean number and proportion ofpatients on potentially inappropriate medications (primary goal); as wellas in decreasing morbidity and mortality and the cost of medications andthe use of healthcare resources (secondary goals).Method: An open-label, cluster-randomized controlled trial will beconducted; where primary care physicians will be randomized either toreceive (intervention group) or not to receive pharmacist recommendationsto withdraw potentially inappropriate medications detected through thecombined use of explicit and implicit criteria (control group). Primary endpoints will be the proportion of patients on potentially inappropriate medications and the mean number of such medications per patient. Secondaryendpoints will be healthcare resources used, the proportion of patientswho die and the mean number of days survived, as well as the cost ofmedications and cost of healthcare resources used. (AU)

Pharmacist-led intervention on potentially inappropriate prescription in patients with polypharmacy: PHARM-PC clinical trial protocol.

OBJECTIVE: Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (that  is, those associated with an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio) are common concerns in the context of elderly patients treated in primary care as they may increase the risk of morbidity and mortality, as well as  healthcare costs. Several studies have assessed the impact of pharmacist- led systematic reviews with respect to prescription appropriateness, health outcomes and/or costs. However, no cluster-randomized controlled  trial has been identified that provides an overall assessment of these  variables. The objective is to determine the effectiveness of a pharmacist- led systematic medication review in reducing the mean number and proportion of patients on potentially inappropriate medications (primary  goal); as well as in decreasing morbidity and mortality and the cost of  medications and the use of healthcare resources (secondary goals). METHOD: An open-label, cluster-randomized controlled trial will be conducted; where primary care physicians will be randomized either to receive (intervention group) or not to receive pharmacist  recommendations to withdraw potentially inappropriate medications  detected through the combined use of explicit and implicit criteria (control  group). Primary end-points will be the proportion of patients on potentially inappropriate medications and the mean number of such medications per  patient. Secondary endpoints will be healthcare resources used, the  proportion of patients who die and the mean number of days survived, as  well as the cost of medications and cost of healthcare resources used. CONCLUSIONS: In line with similar reports and based on our study´s design, we hope to obtain statistically significant reductions in the use  of potentially inappropriate medications and in medication costs overall.  We do not however expect to obtain significant reductions in  morbimortality or the cost of health resources employed.

Objetivo: La polimedicación y la medicación potencialmente inapropiada (que presenta balance beneficio-riesgo desfavorable) son  importantes preocupaciones respecto a los pacientes mayores en atención  primaria, ya que pueden incrementar el riesgo de morbimortalidad y los  costes sanitarios. Diversos estudios han evaluado el impacto de la revisión  sistemática de la medicación conducida por el farmacéutico sobre variables de adecuación, recursos sanitarios y/o costes. Sin embargo, no se han  encontrado ensayos controlados aleatorizados por clúster que evalúen  globalmente todas estas variables. El objetivo de este estudio es  determinar el impacto de una revisión sistemática de medicación  conducida por el farmacéutico para reducir el número medio y la  proporción de pacientes con medicación potencialmente inapropiada  (objetivo principal), así como para reducir la morbimortalidad y los costes  (objetivos secundarios).Método: Se realizará un ensayo clínico abierto, controlado y aleatorizado por clústeres, donde los médicos de atención primaria, en  representación de sus respectivos cupos de pacientes, serán aleatorizados a recibir recomendaciones del farmacéutico para retirar  medicaciones potencialmente inapropiadas detectadas mediante  combinación de métodos implícitos y explícitos (grupo intervención) o no  recibirlas (grupo control). Las variables primarias serán la proporción de  pacientes y el número medio de medicaciones potencialmente  inapropiadas por paciente. Las variables secundarias serán los recursos  asistenciales frecuentados, proporción de pacientes fallecidos y días de  supervivencia; y costes de medicamentos y de recursos asistenciales.Conclusiones: Análogamente a estudios similares, y en base al diseño de  nuestro estudio, esperamos obtener reducción estadísticamente  ignificativa para medicaciones potencialmente inapropiadas y costes de medicamentos. Sin embargo, no esperamos diferencias significativas en morbimortalidad ni en costes de recursos asistenciales.

A Mobile Phone-Based Intervention to Reduce Mental Health Problems in Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic (PsyCovidApp): Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The global health emergency generated by the COVID-19 pandemic is posing an unprecedented challenge to health care workers, who are facing heavy workloads under psychologically difficult situations. Mental mobile Health (mHealth) interventions are now being widely deployed due to their attractive implementation features, despite the lack of evidence about their efficacy in this specific population and context. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a psychoeducational, mindfulness-based mHealth intervention to reduce mental health problems in health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a blinded, parallel-group, controlled trial in Spain. Health care workers providing face-to-face health care to patients with COVID-19 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive the PsyCovidApp intervention (an app targeting emotional skills, healthy lifestyle behavior, burnout, and social support) or a control app (general recommendations about mental health care) for 2 weeks. The participants were blinded to their group allocation. Data were collected telephonically at baseline and after 2 weeks by trained health psychologists. The primary outcome was a composite of depression, anxiety, and stress (overall score on the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 [DASS-21]). Secondary outcomes were insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index), burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey), posttraumatic stress (Davidson Trauma Scale), self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy Scale), and DASS-21 individual scale scores. Differences between groups were analyzed using general linear modeling according to an intention-to-treat protocol. Additionally, we measured the usability of the PsyCovidApp (System Usability Scale). The outcome data collectors and trial statisticians were unaware of the treatment allocation. RESULTS: Between May 14 and July 25, 2020, 482 health care workers were recruited and randomly assigned to PsyCovidApp (n=248) or the control app (n=234). At 2 weeks, complete outcome data were available for 436/482 participants (90.5%). No significant differences were observed between the groups at 2 weeks in the primary outcome (standardized mean difference -0.04; 95% CI -0.11 to 0.04; P=.15) or in the other outcomes. In our prespecified subgroup analyses, we observed significant improvements among health care workers consuming psychotropic medications (n=79) in the primary outcome (-0.29; 95% CI -0.48 to -0.09; P=.004), and in posttraumatic stress, insomnia, anxiety, and stress. Similarly, among health care workers receiving psychotherapy (n=43), we observed improvements in the primary outcome (-0.25; 95% CI -0.49 to -0.02; P=.02), and in insomnia, anxiety, and stress. The mean usability score of PsyCovidApp was high (87.21/100, SD 12.65). After the trial, 208/221 participants in the intervention group (94.1%) asked to regain access to PsyCovidApp, indicating high acceptability. CONCLUSIONS: In health care workers assisting patients with COVID-19 in Spain, PsyCovidApp, compared with a control app, reduced mental health problems at 2 weeks only among health care workers receiving psychotherapy or psychotropic medications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04393818; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04393818.

Assessing the Impact of Multi-Morbidity and Related Constructs on Patient Reported Safety in Primary Care: Generalized Structural Equation Modelling of Observational Data.

We aimed to examine the complex relationships between patient safety processes and outcomes and multimorbidity using a comprehensive set of constructs: multimorbidity, polypharmacy, discordant comorbidity (diseases not sharing either pathogenesis nor management), morbidity burden and patient complexity. We used cross-sectional data from 4782 patients in 69 primary care centres in Spain. We constructed generalized structural equation models to examine the associations between multimorbidity constructs and patient-reported patient safety (PREOS-PC questionnaire). These associations were modelled through direct and indirect (mediated by increased interactions with healthcare) pathways. For women, a consistent association between higher levels of the multimorbidity constructs and lower levels of patient safety was observed via either pathway. The findings for men replicated these observations for polypharmacy, morbidity burden and patient complexity via indirect pathways. However, direct pathways showed unexpected associations between higher levels of multimorbidity and better safety. The consistent association between multimorbidity constructs and worse patient safety among women makes it advisable to target this group for the development of interventions, with particular attention to the role of comorbidity discordance. Further research, particularly qualitative research, is needed for clarifying the complex associations among men.

Perceived Factors of Stress and Its Outcomes among Hotel Housekeepers in the Balearic Islands: A Qualitative Approach from a Gender Perspective.

Tourism is the main economic sector in the Balearic Islands (Spain) and hotel housekeepers (HHs) are a large occupational group, in which stress is becoming a major issue. This study aims at exploring in-depth factors perceived as stressors by HHs and key-informants, and their effects on work-life balance (WLB). A qualitative design with phenomenological approach was used, conducting six focus groups with 34 HHs and 10 individual interviews with key-informants. Results were analyzed adopting the job demands-resources model and a gender perspective. High demands, e.g., work overload, time pressure, physical burden…, lack of enough resources and little control, derived from role conflict, unexpected events…, were the most important factors explaining HHs' stress. Additionally, this imbalance was perceived as leading to health problems, mainly musculoskeletal disorders. Working schedule was mentioned as a facilitator to WLB, whereas an imbalance between job demands and resources led to work-home conflict, preventing them from enjoying leisure time. Multiple roles at work and at home increased their stress. HHs experienced their job as invisible and unrecognised. Regarding practical implications, our recommendations for hotel organization include reducing workload and increasing resources, which would improve the job demands-resource balance, diminish negative mental and physical outcomes and improve WLB.

Lugar de la muerte de las personas tributarias de recibir cuidados paliativos en las Illes Balears / Place of death of people candidate to recive palliative care in the Balearic Islands

OBJETIVO: Describir dónde fallecen las personas tributarias de recibir atención por servicios específicos de cuidados paliativos en la Comunidad Autónoma de les Illes Balears (CAIB) en los años 2015 y 2016. MÉTODO: Estudio descriptivo. Sujetos: personas fallecidas en la CAIB por causas susceptibles de requerir atención paliativa prestada por los servicios específi cos de CP. VARIABLES: lugar de fallecimiento, sector sanitario, causa, sexo y edad. Fuentes: registro de mortalidad de la CAIB y memorias de actividad de los Equipos de Soporte de Atención Domiciliaria y de la Unidad de Cuidados Paliativos Pediátricos del Hospital Son Espases. RESULTADOS: En 2015 fallecieron en el domicilio 852 personas, mientras que en el año 2016 fueron 837. Representan el 31,2 y el 28,9 %, respectivamente, del total de fallecidos tributarios de recibir cuidados paliativos específicos. El número de personas que fallecen en el domicilio es distinto entre los sectores sanitarios de las islas con porcentajes que oscilan entre el 20,6 y el 48 %. También se han hallado diferencias en función del sexo de las personas fallecidas en domicilio, siendo menor en los hombres que en las mujeres. CONCLUSIONES: Los porcentajes de fallecidos en domicilio en CAIB se encuentran alejados de las preferencias manifestadas en los estudios revisados. Existe variabilidad entre los sectores sanitarios de la Comunidad. Se han reducido los porcentajes de muerte en domicilio entre los años 2015 y 2016. Se identifi can diferencias en función del sexo y de las patologías analizadas. Necesitamos avanzar en la disponibilidad de estándares

OBJECTIVE: To describe where people candidate to receive specific palliative care (PC) services died in the autonomous community of the Balearic Islands (CAIB) from 2015 through 2016. METHOD: This was a descriptive study. Subjects: people who died in the CAIB from causes susceptible to requiring palliative care by specific PC services. VARIABLES: place of death, health care sector, cause, sex, and age. Sources: CAIB death registry and activity reports by home care suport teams (ESAD) and the pediatric palliative care unit (PPCUN) at Hospital Son Espases. RESULTS: In 2015 a total of 852 patients died in their homes, whereas in 2016 the number of home deaths was 837. These represent 31.2 % and 28.9 % of all deaths in patients candidate to receive specific palliative care, respectively. The number of patients who die in their homes varies among health care sectors in the Islands, with percentages oscillating between 20.6 % and 48 %. Differences were also found according to the gender of those who died in their homes, with numbers being lower for men as compared to women. CONCLUSIONS: The percentages of home deaths in the CAIB are far removed from the preferences reported in the studies reviewed. There is variability among health care sectors in our autonomous community. Home death percentages decreased from 2015 to 2016. Differences may be identified according to gender and health condition. We need to move forward to having some standards available

[Evolution of the outpatient antibiotic prescription between 2012 and 2018. Characteristics of the ABPresclín platform created for the analysis of antibiotic prescription in the health service of the Balearic Islands.] / Evolución de la prescripción antibiótica ambulatoria entre 2012 y 2018. Características de la plataforma ABPresclín creada para el análisis de prescripción antibiótica en el Servicio de Salud de las Islas Baleares.

OBJECTIVE: One of the fist lines of action of the National Plan against Antibiotic Resistance (PRAN) is to monitor the use of antibiotics as a fundamental basis for the fight against resistance. In order to know the antibiotic prescription habits, we pretended to describe the outpatient prescription of systemic antibiotics in the Balearic Islands through exploitation of ABPresclín database. METHODS: It was an ecological descriptive study of the electronic outpatient prescriptions of systemic antibiotics of the Health Service of the Balearic Islands from 2012 to 2018. Combining the prescription with population information data by year and geographical area, prescription rates were obtained per 1,000 person, distributed by professional, health centres, geographical areas: distribution per patient characteristics, type of antibiotics and associated diagnoses. RESULTS: 3,517,101 prescriptions are analyzed with an average prescription period (TPp) per 1,000 person-years of 472.1. A quarter of the population received at least one prescription of antibiotics. TPp was higher in over 80 years (899.0) and in women (553.4). 68.9% of the prescription was made in primary care (AP) and 17.9% in out-of-hours settings. TPp in AP was 333.1, varying from 192.3 to 527.0, according to basic health areas. The TPp of the most commonly used antibiotics was: amoxicillin/clavulanic (143), amoxicillin (95.9), azithromycin (54.5), fosfomycin (41.5) and ciprofloxacin (29.7). The main associated diagnoses were: lower respiratory infections (16.5%), urinary infections (15%), non-infectious (15%), tonsillitis (14.3%) and upper respiratory infections (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Balearic Islands have a relatively low antibiotic prescription rate with a marked variability between prescribers. Amoxicillin/clavulanic was the most prescribed antibiotic, with an increase in azithromycin. Respiratory infections were the main reason for prescription. ABPresclín is useful to promote better use of antibiotics.

OBJETIVO: Una de las líneas de actuación del Plan Nacional frente a la Resistencia a los Antibióticos (PRAN) es la vigilancia del uso de los antibióticos como pilar fundamental en la lucha frente a la resistencia. Con la finalidad de conocer los hábitos de prescripción de antibióticos, este trabajo pretendió describir la prescripción ambulatoria de antibióticos sistémicos en Baleares mediante la explotación de la base de datos ABPresclín. METODOS: Se elaboró un diseño descriptivo ecológico de la prescripción ambulatoria de antibióticos sistémicos en el Servicio de Salud de las Islas Baleares, entre 2012 y 2018. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de la prescripción antibiótica que, si se refería a un denominador poblacional por año o periodo, permitía obtener tasas de prescripciones por cada 1.000 personas, distribuidas por profesional, por cupo o por áreas geográficas (zonas básicas de salud y áreas), o bien según las características del paciente, el tipo de antibióticos y los diagnósticos asociados. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 3.517.101 prescripciones, con una tasa de prescripción del período (TPp) por cada 1.000 personas-año de 472,1. Una cuarta parte de la población recibió al menos una prescripción de antibióticos. La TPp fue mayor en >80 años (899) y en mujeres (553,4). El 68,9% de la prescripción se realizó en consulta de atención primaria (AP) y el 17,9% en urgencias extrahospitalarias. La TPp en AP fue de 333,1, variando entre 192,3 y 527, según las zonas básicas de salud. La TPp de los antibióticos más utilizados fue: amoxicilina/clavulánico, 143; amoxicilina, 95,9; azitromicina, 54,5; fosfomicina, 41,5; y ciprofloxacino, 29,7. Se asociaron principalmente los diagnósticos de infecciones respiratorias de vías bajas (16,5%), infecciones urinarias (15%), no infecciosos (15%), amigdalitis (14,3%) e infecciones respiratorias de vías altas (13%). CONCLUSIONES: Baleares presenta una tasa de prescripción de antibióticos relativamente baja, con una marcada variabilidad. Amoxicilina/clavulánico es el antibiótico más prescrito, con incremento de la azitromicina. Las infecciones respiratorias son el principal motivo de prescripción. ABPresclín resulta útil para promover un mejor uso de antibióticos.

Effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention, consisting of self-management of antihypertensive medication, self-measurement of blood pressure, hypocaloric and low sodium diet, and physical exercise, in patients with uncontrolled hypertension taking 2 or more antihypertensive drugs: The MEDICHY study.

INTRODUCTION: High blood pressure is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and is associated with high morbidity and mortality and with significant health care costs for individuals and society. However, fewer than half of the patients with hypertension receiving pharmacological treatment have adequate blood pressure control. The main reasons for this are therapeutic inertia, lack of adherence to treatment, and unhealthy lifestyle (i.e., excess dietary fat and salt, sedentary lifestyle, and overweight). Cardiovascular risk and mortality are greater in hypertensive patients who are receiving treatment but have suboptimal control of blood pressure. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicentre, parallel, 2-arm, single-blind (outcome assessor), controled, cluster-randomized clinical trial. General practitioners and nurses will be randomly allocated to the intervention group (self-management of antihypertensive medication, self-measurement of blood pressure, hypocaloric and low sodium diet, and physical exercise) or the control group (regular clinical practice). A total of 424 patients in primary care centers who use 2 or more antihypertensive drugs and blood pressure of at least 130/80 during 24-hambulatory blood pressure monitoring will be recruited. The primary outcome is systolic blood pressure at 12 months. The secondary outcomes are blood pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg); quality of life (EuroQol 5D); direct health care costs; adherence to use of antihypertensive medication; and cardiovascular risk (REGICOR and SCORE scales). DISCUSSION: This trial will be conducted in the primary care setting and will evaluate the impact of a multifactorial intervention consisting of self-management of blood pressure, antihypertensive medications, and lifestyle modifications (hypocaloric and low sodium diet and physical exercise).

Evolución de la prescripción antibiótica ambulatoria entre 2012 y 2018. características de la plataforma abpresclín creada para el análisis de prescripción antibiótica en el servicio de salud de las Islas Baleares / Evolution of the outpatient antibiotic prescription between 2012 and 2018. Characteristics of the ABPresclín platform created for the analysis of antibiotic prescription in the health service of the Balearic Islands

OBJETIVO: Una de las líneas de actuación del Plan Nacional frente a la Resistencia a los Antibióticos (PRAN) es la vigilancia del uso de los antibióticos como pilar fundamental en la lucha frente a la resistencia. Con la finalidad de conocer los hábitos de prescripción de antibióticos, este trabajo pretendió describir la prescripción ambulatoria de antibióticos sistémicos en Baleares mediante la explotación de la base de datos ABPresclín. MÉTODOS: Se elaboró un diseño descriptivo ecológico de la prescripción ambulatoria de antibióticos sistémicos en el Servicio de Salud de las Islas Baleares, entre 2012 y 2018. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de la prescripción antibiótica que, si se refería a un denominador poblacional por año o periodo, permitía obtener tasas de prescripciones por cada 1.000 personas, distribuidas por profesional, por cupo o por áreas geográficas (zonas básicas de salud y áreas), o bien según las características del paciente, el tipo de antibióticos y los diagnósticos asociados. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 3.517.101 prescripciones, con una tasa de prescripción del período (TPp) por cada 1.000 personas-año de 472,1. Una cuarta parte de la población recibió al menos una prescripción de antibióticos. La TPp fue mayor en >80 años (899) y en mujeres (553,4). El 68,9% de la prescripción se realizó en consulta de atención primaria (AP) y el 17,9% en urgencias extrahospitalarias. La TPp en AP fue de 333,1, variando entre 192,3 y 527, según las zonas básicas de salud. La TPp de los antibióticos más utilizados fue: amoxicilina/clavulánico, 143; amoxicilina, 95,9; azitromicina, 54,5; fosfomicina, 41,5; y ciprofloxacino, 29,7. Se asociaron principalmente los diagnósticos de infecciones respiratorias de vías bajas (16,5%), infecciones urinarias (15%), no infecciosos (15%), amigdalitis (14,3%) e infecciones respiratorias de vías altas (13%). CONCLUSIONES: Baleares presenta una tasa de prescripción de antibióticos relativamente baja, con una marcada variabilidad. Amoxicilina/clavulánico es el antibiótico más prescrito, con incremento de la azitromicina. Las infecciones respiratorias son el principal motivo de prescripción. ABPresclín resulta útil para promover un mejor uso de antibióticos

OBJECTIVE: One of the fist lines of action of the National Plan against Antibiotic Resistance (PRAN) is to monitor the use of antibiotics as a fundamental basis for the fight against resistance. In order to know the antibiotic prescription habits, we pretended to describe the outpatient prescription of systemic antibiotics in the Balearic Islands through exploitation of ABPresclín database. METHODS: It was an ecological descriptive study of the electronic outpatient prescriptions of systemic antibiotics of the Health Service of the Balearic Islands from 2012 to 2018. Combining the prescription with population information data by year and geographical area, prescription rates were obtained per 1,000 person, distributed by professional, health centres, geographical areas: distribution per patient characteristics, type of antibiotics and associated diagnoses. RESULTS: 3,517,101 prescriptions are analyzed with an average prescription period (TPp) per 1,000 person-years of 472.1. A quarter of the population received at least one prescription of antibiotics. TPp was higher in over 80 years (899.0) and in women (553.4). 68.9% of the prescription was made in primary care (AP) and 17.9% in out-of-hours settings. TPp in AP was 333.1, varying from 192.3 to 527.0, according to basic health areas. The TPp of the most commonly used antibiotics was: amoxicillin/clavulanic (143), amoxicillin (95.9), azithromycin (54.5), fosfomycin (41.5) and ciprofloxacin (29.7). The main associated diagnoses were: lower respiratory infections (16.5%), urinary infections (15%), non-infectious (15%), tonsillitis (14.3%) and upper respiratory infections (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Balearic Islands have a relatively low antibiotic prescription rate with a marked variability between prescribers. Amoxicillin/clavulanic was the most prescribed antibiotic, with an increase in azithromycin. Respiratory infections were the main reason for prescription. ABPresclín is useful to promote better use of antibiotics

Los maletines domiciliarios de los médicos de familia / The home visit briefcases of family doctors

No disponible

No disponible

La red de investigación en actividades preventivas y promoción de la salud: un reto para la atención primaria / The network of research info preventive activities and health promotion: a challenge for primary care

No disponible

No disponible